Supreme Court Upholds Findings Linking John Eastman to Trump’s Election Challenge Efforts

In a recent development, the U.S. Supreme Court, with Justice Clarence Thomas recusing himself, has rejected attorney John Eastman’s attempt to erase court rulings that implicated him in former President Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.

This decision effectively upholds the findings of a federal district judge in California who determined that Eastman’s emails contained evidence of potential criminal activities related to Trump’s election challenges.

Justice Thomas did not provide a specific reason for his recusal, but some of the emails in question, which were inadvertently made public during a legal dispute between Eastman and congressional investigators, revealed top Trump advisers discussing Thomas as a potential ally in their efforts to convince the Supreme Court to validate Trump’s claims.

Notably, Eastman had previously clerked for Justice Thomas and had maintained some contacts with his wife, conservative activist Ginni Thomas.

Eastman’s attempt to overturn unfavorable court rulings gained significance following his indictment in Georgia, alongside Trump and 17 others, on charges of attempting to subvert the state’s election results in 2020. In addition to the criminal charges, California bar authorities are seeking to revoke Eastman’s law license due to his actions, and a trial on this matter has been ongoing since June.

In his petition to the Supreme Court, Eastman argued that the Jan. 6 select committee inadvertently made sensitive emails public by including a live URL in one of their court filings, accessible by POLITICO.

This mistake, according to Eastman, undermined his efforts to prevent the committee from accessing the emails in the first place. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Eastman’s argument, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court’s decision to reject Eastman’s appeal aligns with the 2022 rulings by U.S. District Court Judge David Carter, who portrayed Eastman’s actions as part of a “coup in search of a legal theory.” Judge Carter also invalidated many of Eastman’s claims of attorney-client privilege over the emails and found some contained evidence of potential criminal behavior.

Judge Carter’s rulings provided crucial evidence to the Jan. 6 select committee, shedding light on Trump’s frantic efforts to overturn the election results. The emails obtained by the committee revealed that Eastman and other allies considered Justice Thomas as their best chance of obtaining a favorable Supreme Court ruling that could cast doubt on the 2020 election results and potentially lead to Republican-led state legislatures intervening to overturn Joe Biden’s victory.

In a December 31, 2020, email exchange, attorney Kenneth Chesebro expressed the desire to frame their efforts in a way that Justice Thomas might issue a favorable opinion by January 6, creating uncertainty about the Georgia election results. Eastman supported this approach, believing that such a move by Thomas or other justices could prompt the Georgia legislature to take action to overturn the election results.

Overall, this recent Supreme Court decision preserves the legal findings that have tied John Eastman to Trump’s controversial attempts to challenge the 2020 election outcome.

Also read: The Battle for California’s Senate Seat: Rep. Barbara Lee’s Supporters Push for Her Appointment